Legal Opinion

McCue v. Bruce Enterprises, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1964No. Civ. 7182PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The plaintiffs, respondents herein, are three married couples, viz., McCue, Heuser and Green; respectively entered into a written contract with the defendant, appellant herein, a sub divider and builder, by which each agreed to purchase from the defendant a lot together with improvements constructed thereon, or to be constructed thereon, by the latter; and brought this action to recover damages on account of fraud and breach of warranty arising out of these transactions. In their complaint setting forth separate causes of action by each couple, the plaintiffs allege that they entered into the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Valdez v. Taylor Automobile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Gonsalves v. HodgsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Nibbi Brothers, Inc. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. San Diego Hospice v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Pepper v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Strebel v. Brenlar Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API