Strebel v. Brenlar Investments, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POLLAK, J.
This case questions the proper measure of damages when a fiduciary fraudulently induces the sale of real property to a third party by failing to disclose a material fact unrelated to the value of the property. Defendants Brenlar Investments, Inc., doing business as Frank Howard Allan (Brenlar) and its agent Haya Smith appeal from a $305,000 judgment against them entered on plaintiff John P. Strebel’s complaint for real estate fraud. Defendants concede that substantial evidence supports the jury’s findings that Smith concealed information about the salability of a house in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- State Department of Health Services v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Salahutdin v. Valley of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Garrett v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Davis v. BelingNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Tribeca Companies, LLC v. First American Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Shum v. Intel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Shum v. Intel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.