Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Colonial Associates, L.L.C.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 25, 2004No. 581A02PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Justice.

This case involves the issue of whether a landlord can be held liable for negligence when his tenant’s dogs injure a third party. Although the dogs in this case committed vicious acts, we refer the readers of this case to State v. Wallace for a recitation of the many virtues of dogs. 49 N.C. App. 475, 271 S.E.2d 760 (1980). As Judge Harry Martin said, “[t]he dog is of a noble, free nature, yet is domesticated and dedicated to the well-being of people of all races.” Id. at 477, 271 S.E.2d at 762. Thus, the acts committed by the dogs in this case should not cast aspersion on the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Smith v. VonCannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Craig v. A.A.R. Realty Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. Shields v. WagmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Krusch v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014
  3. Walden v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Lynne Kritter v. Brent MooringCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API