Legal Opinion

Shields v. Wagman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 6, 1998No. 109, September Term, 1997PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

In the instant case, we are called upon to determine whether a landlord of commercial property may be held liable for injuries sustained in the common area and caused by an American Pit Bull Terrier (pit bull) kept on the leased premises by one of the tenants where the landlord had knowledge of the potential danger and the ability to rid the premises of that danger by refusing to re-let the premises. We hold that, under the circumstances of this case, there was a duty by which the landlord may be held liable for the injuries sustained by the Petitioners.

I

Because this case…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Scott v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Strunk v. ZoltanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Bramble v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Jones v. Hyatt Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Hemmings v. Pelham Wood Ltd. Liability Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Rhaney v. University of Maryland Eastern ShoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Duncan-Bogley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API