Legal Opinion
Guill v. Mayor and Council of City of Hoboken
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 28, 1956PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Heher, J.
At issue here is the legal sufficiency of certain provisions of an ordinance regulative of the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages adopted December 7, 1955 by the Mayor and Council of the City of Hoboken ordaining, Article VIII, Section 1, that no “licensee, agent or other employee connected with or employed by or to be connected with or employed by the licensee shall * * * (g) Employ or permit the employment of any female to tend bar on the licensed premises,” but that the regulation “shall not prohibit a female licensee from tending…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Goesaert v. ClearySupreme Court of the United States · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Perna v. PirozziSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Shapiro v. Essex Cty. Freeholders Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Grand Union Co. v. SillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.