Legal Opinion
Goesaert v. Cleary
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 20, 1948No. 49PublishedCited by 296 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
As part of the Michigan system for controlling the sale of liquor, bartenders are required to be licensed in all cities having a population of 50,000 or more, but no female may be so licensed unless she be “the wife or daughter of the male owner” of a licensed liquor establishment. Section 19a of Act 133 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1945, Mich. Stat. Ann. § 18.990 (1) (Cum. Supp. 1947). The case is here on direct appeal from an order of the District Court of three judges, convened under § 266 of the old Judicial Code, now 28 U. S. C. § 2284, denying an injunction to restrain the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Comm'rs for Port of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Carter v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by296 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
291 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.