Legal Opinion

Bank of America v. Lallana

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1998No. S062489PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

Under California law, a secured creditor who sells the collateral after the debtor’s default may be entitled to a judgment for the difference between the amount owed and the proceeds of the sale. To obtain such a deficiency judgment, however, the creditor must satisfy certain statutory requirements. For secured debts subject to its provisions, the Rees-Levering Motor Vehicle Sales and Finance Act (Civ. Code, § 2981 et seq.; hereafter the Rees-Levering Act) requires that a creditor, before selling a repossessed car, notify the debtor of the right to redeem the car before…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ford & Vlahos v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Buran Equipment Co. v. H & C INVESTMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Lloyd's Plan, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fodale v. Waste Management of Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Harustak v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. In Re AcayaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2007
  4. Americredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Penrod (In Re Penrod)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Crystaplex Plastics, Ltd. v. Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API