Legal Opinion
Crystaplex Plastics, Ltd. v. Redevelopment Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 2000No. E024343PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST,J.
The trial court sustained the demurrer of defendant Redevelopment Agency of the City of Bar stow (Redevelopment Agency) to plaintiff’s first amended complaint without leave to amend and ordered the action dismissed. Plaintiff appeals.
Standard of Review
“Where a trial court sustains a demurrer without leave to amend, we review such action under the abuse of discretion standard. [Citations.] If there is a reasonable possibility that the pleading can be cured by an amendment, the trial court’s ruling will be reversed. [Citation.] [¶] On review, we examine the Complaint’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Abington Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Post Bros. Construction Co. v. YoderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. NarulaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Bank of America v. LallanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rothschild v. Tyco Internationall (US), Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- McAllen Hospitals, L.P. D/B/A McAllen Medical Center v. State Farm County Mutual Insurance Company of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- ViewPoint Bank v. Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- State ex rel. North Dakota Housing Finance Agency v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Jozefowicz v. Allstate Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.