Legal Opinion
Ramondetta v. Amenta
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 15, 2006No. AC 26160PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, J.
This appeal arises from the settlement of a trust. The plaintiffs, Joseph J. Ramondetta II and John Ramondetta, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Salvatore Amenta, trustee, contending that the court improperly (1) concluded that the defendant did not breach his fiduciary duty as trustee and (2) rejected their statute *153of limitations defense. In addition, they raise multiple claims concerning the court’s award of damages. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The court’s memorandum of decision and the record reveal the following…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Schleicher v. SchleicherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Burton v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- McCook v. Whitebirch Construction, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- 36 DeForest Avenue, LLC v. CreadoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Conservation Com'n of Fairfield v. Red 11Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Martino v. ScalzoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.