Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota

OPINION

STRAS, Justice.

Appellant Michael Wayne appeals the postconviction court’s denial of a request that he formally styled as a “Motion for Correction of Sentence” under Minn. R.Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9. Because the postconviction court did not err in treating Wayne’s request as a petition for postcon-viction relief and Wayne filed his request after the 2-year postconviction statute of limitations had expired, we affirm.

I

In 1987, following a jury trial, the district court convicted appellant Michael Wayne of the offense of first-degree mur der while committing criminal sexual conduct, see…