Berkovitz v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
Appellant Susan Rae Berkovitz appeals the postconviction court’s denial of her second petition for postconviction relief. Because we conclude that Berkovitz filed her petition after the expiration of the two-year limitations period in Minn.Stat. § 590.01, subd. 4(a) (2012), and no exception to the limitations period applies, we affirm.
*206I.
Our opinion in Berkovitz’s direct appeal more fully discusses the facts underlying her convictions. See State v. Berkovitz, 705 N.W.2d 399 (Minn.2005). We therefore briefly recite only the facts that are relevant to Berkovitz’s claims for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Paul Winestock, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Hodgson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hooper v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Pearson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Nissalke v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Michael Wayne v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Joel Marvin Munt v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.