Legal Opinion

T.M.C. v. S.A.C.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1993No. S-5259PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Soon after his divorce from S.A.C., T.M.C. sought to modify the trial court’s custody order, which granted the couple joint custody over their daughter K.C., on the grounds that changed circumstances required an award of sole custody to him. The trial court did not find the changed circumstances that T.M.C. alleged, but sua sponte found that a different change of circumstances warranted an award to S.A.C. of sole custody. We affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

T.M.C. and S.A.C. obtained a divorce in 1990. Judge J. Justin Ripley ordered that they share…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beck v. BeckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Ford v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Long v. LongAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Farrell v. FarrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cushing v. PainterAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Siekawitch v. SiekawitchAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Lashbrook v. LashbrookAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Peterson v. SwarthoutAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Howlett v. HowlettAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Geldermann v. GeldermannAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API