Legal Opinion

Howlett v. Howlett

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1995No. S-6523PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

I. INTRODUCTION

This case involves an order modifying child custody. It was entered without a hearing and was not accompanied by findings of fact or conclusions of law. We reverse.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Steven Howlett and Viveca Stone (formerly Howlett) were divorced on May 5, 1992. The superior court awarded Viveca custody of the parties’ three minor children, Jacob and Zachary, born December 14, 1975, and Hilary, born July 26, 1979.

On June 16,1994, Steven filed a motion for modification of child custody and support, supported by a memorandum of law and an affidavit. Steven requested…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Julsen v. JulsenAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Lee v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Cushing v. PainterAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Epperson v. EppersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bird v. StarkeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lashbrook v. LashbrookAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Price v. EasthamAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Faulkner v. GoldfussAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Walker v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API