Legal Opinion
Taher v. Wichita State University
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 7, 2007No. Civil Action 06-2132-KHVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.
Syed Taher sues Wichita State University (“WSU” or “the University”) for employment discrimination, retaliation and hostile work environment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 44) filed August 17, 2007. For reasons stated below, the Court sustains defendant’s motion.
I. Legal Standards
Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boese v. Fort Hays State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2011
- Lucero v. Sandia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- McIntyre v. LONGWOOD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Moore-Stovall v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Robinson v. City of Arkansas CityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.