Legal Opinion

Moore-Stovall v. Shinseki

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 3, 2013No. Civil Action No. 10-2643-KHVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.

Plaintiff asserts Title VII claims against her former employer, the Veterans Administration. Plaintiff alleges that defendant took adverse employment actions against her because of sex, race and national origin and in retaliation for her complaints of discrimination.1 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 74) filed February 19, 2013. Defendant seeks summary judgment on all of plaintiffs claims, arguing that (1) it did not take adverse action against plaintiff, (2) to the extent that it did…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Downs v. Jostens, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2014
  2. Al-Hammouri v. American Bottling CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
  3. Palmer v. PentairDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
  4. Schlegel v. Finney County, Kansas Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
  5. Young v. Physician Office Partners, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API