Legal Opinion
Rolle v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 25, 1984No. 83-1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
451 So.2d 497 (1984)
Gregory D. ROLLE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 83-1990.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 25, 1984.
Rehearing Denied June 27, 1984.
William G. Crawford, Jr. of Hodges, Gossett, McDonald, Gossett & Crawford, P.A., Hollywood, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Russell S. Bohn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
ANSTEAD, Chief Judge.
At issue is whether petitioner's allegations of newly discovered evidence in his petition for leave to file a petition for writ of error coram nobis are sufficient to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hallman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Lamb v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- Mikulovsky v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Dobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Preston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Rolle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Linkous v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Norris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990