Legal Opinion

Linkous v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 11, 1991No. Nos. 89-00706, 89-02730PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

John Linkous appeals the denial of two motions for postconviction relief, both filed ¡n same circuit court case and disposed of below in a coordinated series of hearings. We affirm.

The first motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, concerned itself chiefly with the effectiveness of the representation provided by Lin-kous’s trial counsel. Few if any of the grounds raised in the motion set forth a prima facie case for relief. Giving Linkous benefit of the doubt, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing at which Lin-kous was present and represented by counsel.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. State v. MateraSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Wild v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  5. Mollica v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Norris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Yoris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API