Linkous v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
John Linkous appeals the denial of two motions for postconviction relief, both filed ¡n same circuit court case and disposed of below in a coordinated series of hearings. We affirm.
The first motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, concerned itself chiefly with the effectiveness of the representation provided by Lin-kous’s trial counsel. Few if any of the grounds raised in the motion set forth a prima facie case for relief. Giving Linkous benefit of the doubt, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing at which Lin-kous was present and represented by counsel.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- State v. MateraSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Wild v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Mollica v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Norris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Yoris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992