Legal Opinion

Rolle v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 29, 1985No. 65570PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal certified to this Court the following question as one of great public importance:

In order to be entitled to an evidentia-ry hearing upon a petition for writ of error coram nobis predicated upon the recent discovery of additional evidence, must a showing be made that the defendant would have been entitled to a dismissal or directed verdict of acquittal had the new evidence been considered at the original trial?

Rolle v. State, 451 So.2d 497 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla.Const.

Rolle filed a petition in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hallman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. Tafero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Rolle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Preston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Linkous v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Norris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Nussdorf v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API