Legal Opinion

Cox v. Moore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Partition. Before Judge Frank Park. Liberty superior court. July 28, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. A ground of a motion for new trial which assigns error because the court excluded certain testimony of a witness will not be considered where the movant has failed to show that the court was advised as to what the answer of the witness would be. Story v. Brown, 98 Ga. 570 (25 S. E. 582); Freeman & Turner News Co. v. Mencken, 115 Ga. 1017 (42 S. E. 369).

2. On the trial of an issue formed by a caveat to the return of partitioners of land a witness testified that in his judgment the division of the land made by the appraisers, or partitioners appointed by the court to divide the land, “was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Freeman & Turner News Co. v. Mencken & Bro.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Story v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Freedman v. BushCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Gunnells v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Riggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Carr v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API