Legal Opinion
Freedman v. Bush
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 25, 1923No. 14248PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)' While it is true that “ assignments of error and recitals of fact in a petition for certiorari not affirmatively verified in the answer can not be considered” (Shirling v. Kennon, 119 Ga. 501 (2), 46 S. E. 630; Moore v. Coleman, 28 Ga. App. 427, 111 S. E. 579), and while “ it is essential to the maintenance of the certiorari . . that the answer should show- that there has been a final judgment or verdict rendered,” still “ this fact may properly appear either in the answer, in the form of a direct statement, or in any other way which will sufficiently…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Landrum v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Brown v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Holcomb, Croft & Co. v. FinchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reese v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Coppedge Dry Cleaning Co. v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Morris v. BatteyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Long v. Burge, Stevens & ConklinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Fuller v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.