Legal Opinion
Carr v. Harden
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 22, 1983No. 4874-8-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
In this partition action, the issue is whether RCW 7.52.0901 requires individual referees to submit written reports showing any disagreement with the referees' majority report. It does not; we affirm.
By stipulation and agreed order, Donald E. Carr and Roberta L. Harden, brother and sister and tenants in common, agreed Mr. Carr is entitled to two-thirds and Mrs. Harden is entitled to one-third of approximately 570 acres of land in Kittitas County. The parties further stipulated *294referees should be appointed pursuant to RCW 7.52.0802 to either partition the property or find that partition cannot…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stannard v. SperrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- Hegewald v. NealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Robbins v. HobartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Cox v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Forest Park Properties, Inc. v. PineOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Platt v. PlattWyoming Supreme Court · 2011