Legal Opinion

Dorwart v. Hall

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1904No. 13,414PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to tlie distinct court for Saline county: George W. Stubbs, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Hastings, 0.

In this case, plaintiff sues to recover $50, which he alleges to be due ou account of one-lialf of commissions earned by himself and defendant as real éstate brokers, in partnership; he alleges a partnership existing between the parties on December 10; that on that day the $100 was paid in; that the defendant refused to pay over any share of it, but that on December 13 an accounting was had between the partners and all partnership debts paid in full, the partnership dissolved, and the $50 was then found due; that it has not been paid and judgment is asked for it, with interest…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Whetstone v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  2. Wilby v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
  3. Buckner v. RiesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864
  4. Pettingill v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Clarke v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alexander v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lamb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Bielenberg v. HigginsMontana Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API