Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Mills

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Lyon District Court. Trial at the March Term, 1885; judgment for plaintiff for $300 and costs. Defendant brings the case here. The opinion states the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Holt, C.:

The defendant in error, plaintiff below, brought his action against plaintiff in error, defendant below, before a justice of the peace. He alleged in his bill of particulars that the plaintiff and defendant were joint makers of a note for $500, and that he had paid the same in full with interest, and prayed for contribution. The defendant made application for and obtained a continuance in the justice’s court, but neither filed any pleadings nor appeared at the trial therein. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, and defendant appealed to the district court. In the district…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Brigham v. EvelethMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. Pettingill v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Crossley v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Wright v. CumpstySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chipley v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Chioffi v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. Frith v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Brooks v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Bielenberg v. HigginsMontana Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API