Legal Opinion

Pettingill v. Jones

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1882PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from, Lyon District Court. Action brought by Jones against Pettingill, to recover a balance due on settlement of a partnership transaction. July 5, 1882, the plaintiff recovered a judgment for $118.44, and costs, against defendant, who brings the case here. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action brought by defendant in error, plaintiff below, to recover a balance due on settlement of a partnership transaction. Stripping the pleadings of all matters in which the parties agreed, and it left this single *750issue for trial. The petition alleged that as partners, the parties bought 900 head of sheep at one purchase, and sold the same in a single lot to L. Adams; that the profits of this transaction were $225, which profits were received and appropriated by the defendant. The answer denied specifically any partnership in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wheeler v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chipley v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Frith v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Mills v. GrayUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Clarke v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  5. Mason v. SieglitzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API