Legal Opinion
Sebastian International, Inc. v. Russolillo
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 25, 2000No. 00-03476-CMPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS CVS, QUALITY KING, TSA, AND KEN TEEPE’S MOTION TO DISMISS
MORENO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Defendants CVS Corporation (“CVS”), Quality King Distributors, Inc. (“Quality King”), T.S.A. Distributing, Inc. (“TSA”), and Ken Teepe’s (“Teepe”) Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 12(b)(6). Having read and considered the moving papers, oppositions, replies, and oral arguments in support thereof, the Court hereby grants in part and denies in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
I
Factual Background
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shirish Wagh v. Metris Direct, Inc. Metris Direct Services, Inc. Metris Companies, Inc. DirectalertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Corrie v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2005
- Shirish Wagh v. Metris Direct, Inc. Metris Direct Services, Inc. Metris Companies, Inc. DirectalertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In re Arizona Theranos, Inc., LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- In re Ariz. Theranos, Inc., Litig.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.