Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Blank v. Beasley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2009No. 2007-2217 and 2007-2220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} The matters before the court are original actions seeking writs of mandamus to compel the director of the Ohio Department of Transportation to appropriate relators’ real property. Because these cases raise similar legal issues, we have consolidated them for resolution. We grant the writs with respect to the damages caused by the contractor’s intentional operation and parking of heavy construction equipment on the relators’ parking lots, which were not part of the appropriation, but were nonetheless taken for public use; we deny the requested writs with respect to the remaining damages…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Proctor v. KardassilarisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. City of Norwood v. SheenOhio Supreme Court · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Golf Village N., LLC v. City of Powell, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. State ex rel. Rohrs v. GermannOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State ex rel. E. Ohio Gas Co. v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Boggs v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Jochum v. Jackson Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API