Legal Opinion

Nessley v. Ladd

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This case was considered, and the decree of the court below affirmed at the Pendleton term in 1896 (29 Or. 354, 45 Pac. 904), and comes up now on a motion for a rehearing. The particular grounds of the application are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Wolverton.

On the appeal in this case there was an affirmance, and the appellants now move for a rehearing, and that the decree of the court below be set aside, and the cause reopened for the consideration of newly discovered evidence. The motion is supported by affidavits showing, in purport, the evidence relied upon, which it is alleged has been discovered since the decree was affirmed. Prior to the appeal there was a motion filed in the Circuit Court by the same parties for a new trial, based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, but the evidence here relied upon is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Southard v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Gale v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Day v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  4. In re Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
  5. Stuart v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex parte FinnOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Denny-Renton Clay & Coal Co. v. SartoriWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Tot v. GongOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Livesley v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Feller v. FellerOregon Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API