Legal Opinion

de Murguiondo v. Hoover

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 18, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.

The facts essential to the proper understanding and decision of this case, are, briefly, as follows: Victor De *11Murguiondo, being the owner of one-fifth undivided interest in some ground rents and reversions in Baltimore City, and twenty acres of land in Baltimore County, on the 30th of April, 1885, mortgaged his undivided fifth interest in the whole property to Elias Livezey, to secure twenty-three hundred and fifty dollars. Upon the tenth of the June following, Victor De Murguiondo filed his bill in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, against the owners of the remaining undivided…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sanders v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lavender v. RosenheimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. v. SchlossbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Johnson v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  4. Roessner v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. In Re Estate of HullCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API