Lavender v. Rosenheim
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Heuisler, J.)
1Opinion of the CourtPearce, J.
This appeal involves the construction of the will of Mrs. Elizabeth Whalen, executed December 19th, 1889, and probated February 18th, 1891. The particular clause which we are required to interpret is the following: “J give, devise and bequeath all the rest and residue of my estate, after the payment of the above-mentioned legacies, unto the wife of my said son, Oliver E. Whalen, absolutely.” The preceding provisions' of the will need not be transcribed; it will be sufficient to state their substance and effect. The testatrix devised and bequeathed all of her estate, of every kind and nature,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Magruder v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Johnson v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Estep v. MackeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- de Murguiondo v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
3Cited by26 opinions
- Saunders v. Maryland Unemployment Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Giant Food, Inc. v. Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Coddington v. . StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Stanley v. American Motorist InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.