Johnson v. Hoover
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.
This case was in this Court before (72 Md., 9,) and, after remand upon the decree reversing the decision of the Court below, the case proceeded to decree for partition. After the remand, and before decree, the Murguiondo heirs sold out their interest, and the appellant, Jessie Johnson, wife of Greenleaf Johnson, and Joseph Friedenwald respectively became purchasers, and, upon application to the Court, were made parties defendant. The bill charged that the Druid Hill property was sus*488ceptible of easy partition. All the defendants agreed in their answers that the allegations of the bill were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tomlinson v. McKaigCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1847
- Bolgiano v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
- Belt v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Campbell v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
- de Murguiondo v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Executors of Fooks v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Anthony Plumbing of Maryland, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Barron v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Arundel Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. LawrenceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Scarlett v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.