MacIel v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED TRIAL ORDER
RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior District Judge.
This case involves Plaintiff Edward Ma-ciel’s various claims against the City of Los Angeles for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The alleged violations are based on the Los Angeles Police Department’s (“LAPD”) policy of not compensating for donning and doffing activities and LAPD’s alleged failure to ensure Edward Maciel received his required meal breaks.
On January 15, 2008, the above matter commenced in a bench trial before this Court. The trial lasted seven days and included the presentation of multiple witnesses and the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Reed v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Perez v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Moore v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Dager v. City of PhoenixDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Farris v. County of RiversideDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.