Worthington Sch. Dist. v. Eureka Sch. Dist.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Defendant demurred successfully to plaintiff’s amended complaint and the latter failing to file a new pleading within the time allowed by the court, an order was made dismissing the action and judgment in favor of defendant was entered accordingly. From said judgment plaintiff appeals.
Both parties to the action are school districts, having adjoining territories. In the amended complaint it was alleged that on November 14, 1912, the board of supervisors of Humboldt County, in which both districts are situated, passed an ordinance whereby said board “took from” the Worthington School District…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pass Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty. v. Hollywood City Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Reclamation Dist. No. 70 v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Kramm v. BogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by16 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Antelope Valley Union High School District v. McClellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.