Legal Opinion

Antelope Valley Union High School District v. McClellan

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1921No. Civ. No. 3717PublishedCited by 19 opinions

PROCEEDING on application for a Writ of Mandate to compel signing of high school bonds. Granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. J. Hill, County Counsel, and Jerry H. Powell, Deputy County Counsel for Petitioner.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This proceeding is one in mandate to compel the respondent, as chairman of the board of supervisors of Los Angeles County, to sign certain bonds which petitioner proposes to issue for high school purposes. An alternative writ was issued, the return to which is made by demurrer to the petition.

The chief ground of opposition to granting the relief sought is the alleged irregularity in the procedure for the annexation of certain intermediate school districts to petitioner high school district, and without which, as constituent parts of said high school district, it is conceded the bonds could…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hughes v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Pass Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty. v. Hollywood City Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. School District No. 3 of Adams v. CallahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Marathon Oil Company v. WelchWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Anderson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Flakoll v. HalamudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API