Legal Opinion

Micheletti v. Fugitt

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1943No. 3373PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Ducker, J.:

Appellant, who was plaintiff below, and will be so called, commenced this action to recover from the First National Bank of Nevada, a banking corporation, the sum of $23,000 alleged to have been received by the bank to and for his use. The bank disclaimed any interest in the money except as to an escrow fee of $275, and on its motion, John C. Fugitt was substituted as defendant. The $23,000 was deposited with the clerk of the court.

Fugitt filed an answer admitting that the $23,000 was received by the bank and denying that it was received to and for the use of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Denunzio v. DenunzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Sargent v. Palace Cafe Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Pugh v. GressettMississippi Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Tanner Motor Tours of Nevada, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Dolge v. MasekNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Tropicana Hotel Corp. v. SpeerNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Good v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Loma Linda University v. EckenweilerNevada Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API