Legal Opinion

Pederson v. First Nat. Bank of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1977No. 8785PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Manoukian, J.:

A complaint was filed by Respondent, First National Bank of Nevada, against co-respondents Orme and Dixie Kilburn, andBjarne Pederson, Appellant, for collection of a $10,588.52 balance remaining on a promissory note. Kilburns, defendants below, as endorsers of the note, cross-complained against Pederson, contending that he had agreed to indemnify them as to the unpaid balance. Pederson defended against both claims urging as his “Fourth Affirmative Defense” that a full compromise and settlement had been effected which precluded the liability of either the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Timney v. TimneyNevada Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Pease v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Western National Insurance v. TrentNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Wolf v. Humboldt CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Walden v. BackusNevada Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Star v. RabelloNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Morris DeLee Family Trust v. Cost Reduction Engineering, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Matthews v. CollmanNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Von Zehner v. Truck Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API