Legal Opinion
Fluharty v. Beatty
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1883PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The opinion of the Court contains the facts of the case.
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, PRESIDENT:
On the 11th clay of August, 1874, the plaintiff, William Fluharty, and the defendant, W. I). Beatty, entered into the following agreement:
“ Article of agreement made and concluded this 11th day of August, 1874, between William Fluharty of the first and William D. Beatty of the second part, said Beatty agrees to bring a good saw-mill and set it up on the lower end of said Fluharty’s home-farm, on or about October next, and buy *700said mill as cheap as he can, and sell said Flaharty one half interest in said mill at cost, and take the pay out of the lumber .when sold and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Karthaus v. Yllas Y FerrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Van Cortlandt v. UnderhillCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1819
- Jackson ex dem. Van Alen & Van Alen v. AmblerNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1826
- Cox v. JaggerNew York Supreme Court · 1824
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Utah Construction Co. v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Parr v. HowellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Boomer Coal & Coke Co. v. OsentonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
- Bassett's Adm'r v. Cunningham's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1853
- Bean v. BeanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.