Legal Opinion

Parr v. Howell

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Harrison County. Action by Charles S. Parr against Calvin P. Howell. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

POEEENBARGER, JUDGE:

This writ of error requires review of a judgment in favor of an owner against a contractor for the cost of completion of a house, incurred under the provisions of the standard builders contract, recommended, it is said, by the American Institute of Architects and the National Association of Builders. Howell bound himself to furnish the materials and labor for the building and complete it at a cost not exceeding the sum of $18,800.00, including his commission of 6 per cent., guaranteed it not to cost more than $18,800.00, and agreed to pay Parr any excess of cost, in case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Halstead v. HortonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gregory's Adm'r v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Dickinson v. Railroad Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. State v. BinghamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Aetna Indemnity Co. v. George A. Fuller Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BraggWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Guyandotte Coal Co. v. Virginian Electric & Machine WorksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. CruikshankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API