Karthaus v. Yllas Y Ferrer
Supreme Court of the United States
ON the 16th of January 1823, the plaintiff in error gave ..an arbitration bond, in the usual form,- with sureties,' to the defendants in error, in which it was set forth, that, “ whereas certain disputes, differences, and controversies, have arisen, and are still depending, between the above bounden Charles W. Karthaus,' acting for the late house of Charles W. Karthaus & Co. and himself, -and the. above' named Francisco Yllas y Fer-.rer, and Josef Antonio Yllas, for the…
Read the full summary
ON the 16th of January 1823, the plaintiff in error gave ..an arbitration bond, in the usual form,- with sureties,' to the defendants in error, in which it was set forth, that, “ whereas certain disputes, differences, and controversies, have arisen, and are still depending, between the above bounden Charles W. Karthaus,' acting for the late house of Charles W. Karthaus & Co. and himself, -and the. above' named Francisco Yllas y Fer-.rer, and Josef Antonio Yllas, for the ending and determining the disputes, differences, and controversies, aforesaid, and ail actions, suits, claims, and demands…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thimble
This was an action of debt, brought by Francisco Yllas, and Josef Antonio YUas, against Charles W.. Karthaus, on an arbitration bond, in the Circuit Court of the district of Maryland.
The defendant, after oyer of the condition of the bond, pleaded, no award made, fee. The plaintiff replied, setting forth the award in hse.c verba, and assigning a breach; the defendants demurred generally, and"' the plaintiff joined in demurrer. The Circuit Court having given-judgment, upon the demurrer, in favouiyof the plaintiffs; the defendant has brought the case up, by writ cp error, for the consideration…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lyle v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
3Cited by53 opinions
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Hall v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook & Weeden, Inc. v. Bernard EllisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Rueda v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.