Legal Opinion
Raulston v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided January 15, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LLOYD S. ADAMS, S. J.
The original bill in this cause was filed in the Chancery Court of Marion County, Tennessee, by the complainants as guardian of William M. Raulston, seeking to enforce payment under a health and accident insurance policy issued to William M. Raulston, the assured, by the defendant Association in January, 1933, providing for payment of monthly indemnity of $25 for total loss of time due to a non-confining illness, which totally disabled the assured. It is averred that William M. Raulston became disabled by reason of nephritis and high blood pressure on or about the 20th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Young v. FitchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Travelers Protective Assn. of America v. PrinsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Conrad v. Interstate Life & Accident InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
- Moss v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Satterfield v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- E. K. Hardison Seed Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
- United States v. Paddock. In Re Globe Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- American Employers Insurance v. Knox-Tenn Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
- Weitzel v. Brown-Neil CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.