Legal Opinion

Satterfield v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

This is an action upon a policy of accident and health insurance. The Casualty Company insists that the amount of its liability is reduced by other insurance covering the same loss.' The circuit court, a jury having been waived, sustained the contention of the Casualty Company, and on appeal the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of the circuit court and awarded a recovery for the full amount of the loss, notwithstanding the existence of other insurance. The Casualty Company has filed its petition for the writs of certiorari and super-sedeas.

The material recitations of the policy are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. GalbraithTennessee Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Raulston v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  3. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. SanteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  4. Hedrick v. Washington National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API