Legal Opinion

Discovery House, Inc. v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided April 1, 1999No. 2:98 CV 437PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY, District Judge.

In the complaint initiating this action plaintiff Discovery House, Inc. alleges that the defendants, the Consolidated City of Indianapolis and the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals of Marion County (“BZA”), intentionally discriminated against Discovery House on the basis of an animus against Discovery House’s dién-tele, when the BZA ruled that Discovery House’s proposed drug rehabilitation treatment center to be located at 5626 East 16th Street in Indianapolis (hereinafter, “methadone clinic”) was not allowed by applicable zoning regulations. Although Discovery…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Smith v. Indiana Department of CorrectionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Mastandrea v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Smith-Berch, Inc. v. Baltimore County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  5. Schneider v. County of Will, State of IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API