Legal Opinion

Cantrell v. Morris

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2006No. 94S00-0505-CQ-243PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We respond to a question certified from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana as follows: 1) we do not resolve whether Article I, Section 9 of the Indiana Constitution imposes any restrictions on government officials in dealing with political activity or affiliation of public employees; 2) to the extent that tort doctrines give a civil damage remedy to a public employee terminated for political activity or affiliation in violation of Article I, Section 9 of the Indiana Constitution, any such wrongful discharge claim is governed by the Indiana…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Pisciotta v. Old National BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Toni Ball v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. McConnell v. McKillipDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2008
  4. Row v. HoltIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Smith v. Indiana Department of CorrectionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API