Legal Opinion

Bethel v. Van Stone

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1991No. 18486PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

The Bethels brought this action against the Van Stones to enjoin interference with the Bethels’ use of an easement which the Bethels claim was conveyed to them by a warranty deed from Walter and Margaret Van Stone in 1974. The Bethels also sought damages against Dale Van Stone for blocking the easement. After a bench trial, the district court ruled for the plaintiffs and awarded them punitive damages and damages for emotional distress. Only Dale Van Stone appealed, contending the award of damages is not supported by the evidence. Also, he contends that the trial court erred…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Rutter v. McLaughlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Linscott v. Rainier National Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Latham v. GarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. USA Cartage Leasing, LLC v. BaerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Evans v. Board of County CommissionersUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Phillips Industries, Inc. v. FirkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Alderson v. BonnerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Phillips Industries, Inc. v. FirkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API