Legal Opinion
Evans v. Board of County Commissioners
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 2005No. 20040739PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEHRING, Justice:
¶ 1 Jamie Evans claims an easement over land owned by the Board of County Commissioners of Utah County. The court of appeals reversed the trial court’s summary judgment finding that Mr. Evans’s easement was too vague to be enforced. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 In 1926, Knight Investment Company recorded the Ironton Plat, a subdivision located in Utah County. The plat is roughly rectangular in shape with its length running north to south. Eight east-to-west streets dedicated to public use divide the plat into seven blocks upon which lots are laid out. Pine…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. BrakeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Wolvos v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Vinson v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Oglebay Norton Co. v. Armco, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Zvonik v. ZvonikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Yorlum Properties, Ltd. v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- USA Cartage Leasing, LLC v. BaerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Walters v. SporerNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Radakovich v. CornabyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
- OAK LANE HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.