Legal Opinion

American Academy of Accountancy v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 21, 1939No. 29190PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.

This was an action on a contract and promissory note, by the payee thereof, against the maker. The defense was, first, that there was fraud in the inducement to execution of the contract and note; second, that there was a failure of consideration. The trial court, without a jury, held for the defendant, the basis of the holding being failure of consideration for the note and its accompanying contract. The plaintiff appeals.

It is urged that the court erred in admitting evidence tending to vary the terms of the contracts sued upon, said evidence tending to show that defendant was fraudulently…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mullen v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Finola Mfg. Co. v. PaulsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Evans v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API