Legal Opinion

Finola Mfg. Co. v. Paulsen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 3, 1915No. 4867PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from County Court, Canadian County; W. A. Maurer, Judge. Action by the Finóla Manufacturing Company against H. C. Paulsen and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. '

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BRETT, C.

The facts in this case, briefly stated, are that the defendants in error, who were defendants below, leased a scrubbing machine from the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, under a written contract, which gave them the right to return the machine at the. end of one year by paying $90 for the use of the machine for that year. And under the same contract defendants purchased two barrels of scrubbing powder to be used with the machine, at a price of $21.79. The evidence is the machine proved unsatisfactory, and the defendants so notified the company; and the president of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Early v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hart v. FrostSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Hill v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. American Academy of Accountancy v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Milam v. HintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API