Legal Opinion
Anderson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1933No. 9525PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Circuit Judge.
This is an action to recover on a contract of war risk insurance. The pleadings are in conventional form. The action was tried to the court without a jury, and, after hearing all the testimony, the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of the defendant, and thereupon entered judgment dismissing the action on its merits. From the judgment so entered, the appellant has appealed. For convenience the parties will be referred to as they were designated in the lower court.
There were no requests for findings of fact nor conclusions of law on behalf of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Eggen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. Le DucCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- McNally v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anderson v. Federal Cartridge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Wall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Travelers Ins. v. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Armstrong v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.