Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 13, 1936No. 10546PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, as plaintiff below, brought action against appellee upon three causes of action joined in one petition. The first and second causes of action were for the recovery of amounts alleged to be due the plaintiff upon two life insurance policies insuring the life of Charles D. Armstrong, husband of appellant, in which policies appellant was named as beneficiary. These first two causes of action were regularly tried to the court and a jury, and are not here involved.

The third cause of action was for the recovery of interest upon the proceeds of life insurance…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Kentucky Life & Acc. Ins. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
  3. Lahman v. Burnes Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. Schmidt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. McClendon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Harris v. BiszkowiczCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. Baldwin v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API