Legal Opinion

DiTrolio v. Antiles

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 27, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

276 N.J. Super. 234 (1994)

647 A.2d 1318

JOSEPH V. DiTROLIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

LEONARD ANTILES, PETER BOORJIAN, DOMENIC FALCONE, OLEH BACHYNSKY, AND THE MONTCLAIR UROLOGICAL GROUP, P.A., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 30, 1993.

Decided September 27, 1994.

Before Judges MICHELS, SKILLMAN and KESTIN.

Frank R. Ciesla argued the cause for appellant (Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, attorneys, Mr. Ciesla and John F. Varley, III, of counsel and on the brief).

Glenn A. Clark argued the cause for respondents Antiles, Boorjian, Falcone, and Bachynsky…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Nolan v. Lee HoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Watkins v. Resorts International Hotel & Casino Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. City of Hackensack v. WinnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Karpovich v. BarbarulaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. McNally v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Unkert v. General Motors Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. Milkap Corp. v. INDUSTRIAL CONST.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API