Legal Opinion

Milkap Corp. v. INDUSTRIAL CONST.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 24, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

281 N.J. Super. 180 (1995)

656 A.2d 1292

MILKAP CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted March 22, 1995.

Decided April 24, 1995.

Before Judges SKILLMAN, WALLACE and KLEINER.

Gravino & Vittese, attorneys for appellant (Mark A. Vittese, of counsel and on the brief).

Markowitz and Zindler, attorneys for respondent (Howard A. Teichman, of counsel and on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by KLEINER, J.A.D.

Prior to 1989,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Fisher v. YatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  4. Reno Auto v. PROSPECT PARK S. & L.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  5. DiTrolio v. AntilesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McNally v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  2. Riemer v. St. Clare's Riverside Medical CenterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API